boomurl vs Vercel
A Vercel alternative for plain static sites
Vercel shines for frameworks and serverless. When you have a folder of static files, boomurl puts it online without a project, a framework, or a build.
Publish your site free →Why people choose boomurl
- No account and no framework — boomurl serves the exact files you upload.
- No build, no environment config, no CLI install required (though a CLI exists).
- Drag a folder or a single HTML file, pick a name, verify your email — live over HTTPS in about 20 seconds.
- First-class support for AI agents publishing via API, MCP, or CLI.
boomurl vs Vercel, at a glance
| boomurl | Vercel | |
|---|---|---|
| Account required | No — one-time email code | Yes |
| Framework / build | None | Build step |
| Time to first live URL | ~20 seconds | Minutes |
| Custom domain + HTTPS | Yes, automatic | Yes |
| Best for | Static pages, demos, AI output | Framework apps + functions |
| Price | Free (ad-supported) | Free tier + paid |
Comparison reflects boomurl's positioning for static sites; Vercel may offer capabilities beyond static hosting.
Frequently asked questions
- When should I use boomurl instead of Vercel?
- When your site is static and you want it live immediately with no account or build — landing pages, portfolios, docs, demos, and AI-generated pages. For framework apps with serverless backends, use a platform like Vercel.
- Does boomurl need a build step?
- No. It serves your static files as-is, so there's nothing to configure.
Try it now
Drag a folder, pick a name — live in about 20 seconds.
Publish your site →